- Joanna Krupa’s nude PETA ad worked [The Superficial]
- Daniel Radcliffe will find any excuse to get naked [Agent Bedhead]
- Susan Boyle’s Album Makes UK Chart History [Evil Beet]
- Snoop Dogg’s new single geaturing Brandy & Pharrell [Bossip]
- Scariest news we’ve heard all year: Heidi Montag might be pregnant [Litely Salted]
- Is Jack Osbourne gaining his weight again? I think he’s looking pretty good [ICYDK]
- The next Twilight film, ‘Breaking Dawn’ may be split into two movies [Moviefone]
- Former Miss Argentina dies after butt firming surgery [Crazy Days and Nights]
- Rebecca De Mornay has clown face [Seriously? OMG! WTF?]
- Sienna Miller and Jude Law Reenact Lady and the Tramp Spaghetti Scene with Pizza [Celebnewswire]
- George Michael’s “December” song [PopBytes]

Tiger Woods’ poor neighbors have had to hire attorneys just to get people to leave them alone. Ever since Woods’ accident, there’s been the general feeling that neighbor Linda Adams and/or her two adult sons saw something, but they aren’t saying. The family rushed to Tiger’s aid after his car hit a fire hydrant and then a tree early Friday morning. Linda Adams called 911 at the request of Tiger’s wife Elin. The family insists they have no secret knowledge that they’re keeping bundled up, and would like everyone to leave them alone.

Tiger Woods’ neighbors — the ones who made the 911 call — just hired lawyers to talk to the media … and one of them just offered up new details about what happened after the crash.

Attorney Bill Sharpe said the Adams family was awake when the crash occurred — and that they were surprised, obviously, when they discovered it was Tiger lying on the ground outside their house.

Sharpe said Tiger’s wife Elin asked them for help — which is why they called 911. The lawyer said they gave Tiger a pillow and a blanket while they waited for an ambulance.

Sharpe said the family told him there were no indications the Woods were fighting that night — and Elin was very concerned for Tiger’s safety.

The next guy, attorney Christian Conrad, wasn’t as forthcoming … reading a brief statement about how the Adams family want to remain good neighbors by shutting their traps about what happened … and want to be left alone.

[From TMZ]

It’s completely understandable that they want to be left out of this media frenzy. Just because they want to be “good neighbors by shutting their traps” doesn’t mean they won’t cooperate with police and share everything they saw. Tiger has been extremely evasive with the police, but there’s no reason to believe his neighbors would be willing to be that accommodating.

TMZ also has more information that suggests Tiger’s facial injuries were not from the car crash. There was no blood anywhere in the car. If he received those injuries from the accident, it’s logical to believe that he would have bled in the car.

Tiger Woods did not bleed in the vehicle he crashed Friday morning — not a single drop — according to law enforcement sources. Cops from the Windermere PD, who first responded on scene, observed Tiger’s lower lip split open and we’re told he had other marks as well. But TMZ sources say there was absolutely no blood in the SUV.

What’s more — we’ve learned Tiger’s wife, Elin Nordegren, told Windermere cops she smashed the back passenger window with the golf club, then unlocked the driver’s door and dragged Tiger out. Yet there were no traces of blood.

This has created even more suspicion with law enforcement … that Tiger’s wounds may have not been the result of SUV meets fire hydrant.

[From TMZ]

This is an excellent example of why it’s always easier to tell the truth. There are just a million little details you don’t consider at the time you’re coming up with an elaborate lie. Obviously you don’t want to believe that Tiger was physically assaulted by his wife. On the other hand, it’s hard to imagine something shady didn’t go down, considering all the evidence that doesn’t line up with their strange version of events. Especially when coupled with Tiger avoiding the police. It’s an interesting mystery, and the affair adds so much drama to the whole thing. It’s sad when you realize people’s lives are spinning out of control right now. Hopefully if nothing else Tiger will at least talk to the police – trying to hide from them can only drag things out.

Elisabeth Hasselbeck likely thought she was home-free when the judge in her copyright lawsuit threw out the case. But even at the time, he noted that it was only because plaintiff Susan Hassett’s (author of “Living with Celiac Disease”) lawyer hadn’t turned in required paperwork, thus he was dismissing it on a technicality. The judge also noted that, “while portions of Hassett’s dietary prose were definitely lifted for Hasselbeck’s book, the passages weren’t significant enough to warrant damages.” Which still leaves the door semi-open for a ferocious enough attorney to re-file the lawsuit, which is exactly what’s happened.

The woman who sued Elisabeth Hasselbeck for copyright infringement just won’t take no for an answer. TMZ has learned Susan Hassett just filed her second lawsuit over Hasselbeck’s book — “The G Free Diet” — even though a judge tossed out Hassett’s first suit earlier this month after her lawyer decided not to pursue the case.

Hassett — who claims Beck’s book is a rip-off of her own publication, “Living with Celiac Disease” — tells TMZ her original lawsuit was shot down because of a technicality … she failed to provide the necessary copyright information for “Living.”

Hassett’s new suit, which was filed today in federal court in Massachusetts, includes plenty of copyright info for “Living” … plus claims that Hasselbeck’s book is “misleading and dangerous” to those who suffer from Celiac disease.

Hassett once again wants the court to stop the presses on “G Free” and yank it from bookstores everywhere.

Calls to Hasselbeck’s people have not been returned.

[From TMZ]

What I find interesting about this case is that Hassett isn’t merely asking for punitive damages, she wants Hasselbeck’s book yanked from the shelves. If this were simply about money to her, I’d think she’d ask for a portion – or all of – the profits. Considering she says Hasselbeck’s book is actually dangerous to people with Celiac disease, wanting it off the shelves makes me think she legitimately cares about the information (or misinformation) that’s out there about the complicated chronic digestive issue.

Hassett’s “Living with Celiac Disease” isn’t ever going to make much money. She self-published the book, (and sent a copy to Hasselbeck, along with a personal note, after hearing her say on “The View” that she suffers from Celiac) and few people would ever have heard of it, were it not for Hasselbeck plagiarizing from it (here’s a breakdown of the nearly-identical parts of the books). She’d make a lot more money if she won a settlement that included letting Hasselbeck’s book stay on the shelves and gave her some of the profits. Considering that’s not what Hassett wants, if nothing else it shows that she actually cares about Celiac disease, whereas Hasselbeck seems to just care about putting her name on it.

Nicole Richie is already a “writer” and a very successful designer. (I don’ t think she likes to call herself a “socialite” anymore). And she’s a mom to two young kids. Even by Hollywood standards, she’s got a good deal on her plate. But that isn’t stopping her from trying to officially become an actress. She’s created a sitcom that’s been picked up by ABC, and it sounds like it has the potential to be decent. So far the plot that they’ve discussed sounds really generic, but it’s in its early phases and still vague. And they’ve got good writers and producers attached, which means it could end up being good.

If you thought Nicole Richie’s reality show was a bit too scripted, what about a scripted show that seems true to life? The Hollywood socialite, 28, is developing an ABC sitcom in which she would both star and produce. Variety says the show will use a single camera, and the concept was Richie’s idea.

Daisy Gardner (Californication) is due to write it, while Warren Bell (According to Jim) will executive produce and supervise the pilot script, reports the trade paper.

“The story revolves around a young, modern and professional woman who must balance her business and family relationships,” Richie writes on her Web site. “She must deal with, and navigate the many ideas of what a woman’s role is: modern vs. traditional.” The mother of two says she’ll use what she sees in her real life to create the show. (Besides this ABC project, Richie is at work on her second novel, not to mention the unveiling of her clothing and shoe labels).

“Lately, I have been surrounded by many different women of all ages and walks of life. It amazes me to watch and observe how many different ideas there are about what a woman’s role should be in this era,” she writes.

“I’ve taken these fascinating ideas, and compiled them into something that I think will be very special (and funny!). We’re still in the very early stages and I can’t wait to share more with you soon!”

[From People]

The whole, “The story revolves around a young, modern and professional woman who must balance her business and family relationships,” sounds insanely dull and like something that’s been done (blandly) about a hundred times. But Nicole is known for her edgy (and sometimes way too over the line) sense of humor, which was often displayed on “The Simple Life.” We haven’t heard about much of her bad behavior in a long time, but maybe if she still has that in her, she could bring some spunk and fire to the show. But right now everything she’s said sounds like she’s playing it safe, and to rather dull effect. There are so few good sitcoms on anymore, but it seems like people are missing them and there are a few new ones popping up every season. It’d be nice if Nicole did something to set hers apart so it actually stayed around, instead of going to ABC family friendly/every night is TGIF route.

Here’s Nicole at the March of Dimes 4th Annual Celebration of Babies at The Four Seasons Hotel on November 7th and with Joel Madden at the noble Awards held at the Beverly Hills Hilton on October 18th. Images thanks to WENN.com .

- Lady GaGa Goes Down In Canada [I'm Not Obsessed]
- Some Things Change, but the Turk Dance Always Remains the Same [Pajiba]
- The Stefani-Rossdales Prepare For Takeoff [Celebrity Baby Scoop]
- ‘Up in the Air’ gives Paramount a marketing challenge [Showhype]
- Vanessa Minnillo is on vacation [The Blemish]
- Padma Lakshmi Likes Herself Better Naked [Starpulse]
- Katharine McPhee Isn’t Waiting For Her Pimp [Hollywood Rag]
- Cat Baby Sitter [CityRag]
- Six Things Every Girl Secretly Wishes Her Boyfriend Would Do [College Candy]
- Salma Hayek @ Mamounia Hotel Inauguration in Marrakech [Moe Jackson]

You may have heard the rumor that Michael Lohan, via Twitter, was threatening to kill himself. Rest assured, the esteemed Lohan family patriarch is alive and well, and assures various concerned media outlets that there’s someone out there on Twitter pretending to be him. Considering how out-of-this-world on-the-ball the Dina Lohan fake Twitterer was, it’s no surprise someone eventually pretended to be Michael. Really, the only surprising thing is that it took so long. Nonetheless, Michael is alive and well. Depending on your definition of “well.”

Michael Lohan doesn’t exactly have a history of verbal restraint, so when a Twitter account named @themichaellohan began writing snippets about family drama and wanting to jump off of the Brooklyn Bridge, entertainment bloggers across the Web figured it was the real deal. Thankfully, it seems the Tweets — like the one that read: “fiance just left me. my family hates me, i spent Thanksgiving with my mom i just cant do any of this any more” — were all bogus, and the father of Lindsay Lohan is still with us. All the Details After the Jump >>

Word of the alleged suicide pleas began to spread on Sunday evening, with sites like Gawker.com and AllieIsWired all jumping on the story. In the Tweets, which have since been erased from the Twitter page, “Lohan” said: “death of father put me in a black hole IDK what to do” and that he was “heading to the brooklyn bridge.” He even sent one to Lindsay’s Twitter account, writing: “@lindsaylohan, love you b ye.” To see all of the now-vanished Tweets, visit AllieIsWired.

[From PopEater]

I’ve got to say, while suicide is never ever funny, it is especially awful that the fake Twitterer sent that message to Lindsay’s real Twitter account. While Michael Lohan is fun to mock, at no point was this particular form of mockery funny or in any way appropriate. But can you imagine if you were Lindsay and you got that Tweet? That is so over the line, and maybe one of the few times I’ve ever had any empathy for Lohans.

Michael wrote to Shabooty.com:

This is not not not me. I do not have and never had a twitter and twitters corp office confirms that. My lawyers r investigating

[From Shabooty]

So that’s that. Looking for an appropriate way to mock a Lohan? How about Shoe-Han?

Screencap thanks to Allie Is Wired. Here’s Michael with former BFF Jon Gosselin playing with their man toys in Reading, PA on October 11th. Images thanks to INF Photo.

Boo hoo for Chris Brown. He’s getting more hard knocks, thanks to all of us bitching ferociously about him getting to perform on Good Morning America. Especially after they’d canceled Adam Lambert’s scheduled performance for his questionable stage antics. Brown has been pulled from the morning show altogether, which is sort of good. And he won’t get to sing and dance and promote his career. The bad news is he’s been moved to 20/20, which could conceivably get him even more viewers. But it’s supposedly a serious “tell-all” interview, and Brown won’t get to plug his music and bounce around on stage like everything’s just fine and he’s a decent guy.

ABC had a change of heart over the weekend and will not let R&B singer Chris Brown sing next week on “Good Morning America.” Instead, Brown has agreed to “come clean” in a primetime interview about what happened the night he beat up former girlfriend Rhianna, according to reports,

The network was bitterly criticized last week after it canceled a performance by flamboyant “Idol” star Adam Lambert on “GMA” — following his raunchy performance on the American Music Awards show — then announced plans for Brown to promote his latest CD with a live show on the program.

When Brown appeared recently on “Larry King Live” and afternoon talk show “Wendy Williams” to apologize for the incident, he sidestepped questions about what happened last February on the night before the Grammy awards when Rhianna, battered and bruised, walked into an LA police station.

Now, he is promising to give details of the incident in an “in-depth interview” with “GMA” host Robin Roberts set to air on “20/20″ Dec. 11. His appearance follows by a month Rhianna’s shocking interview with Diane Sawyer on the same show that drew nearly 9 million viewers, unusually high for a news show.

On that show, Rhianna admitted she was “embarrassed” that she had gone back to Brown shortly after the beating and entertained the idea of a reconciliation. The interview with Brown — which is being billed as his reply to Rhianna — was taped over the weekend, according to reports. ABC did not say why it canceled its original plan to air a Brown interview and stage a short concert only on its morning show and move it to primetime — without the music.

[From the New York Post]

Well sure, obviously they couldn’t say, “We made such a bad decision that everyone freaked out so we had to do something more responsible!” Thus… no comment. I doubt this’ll be Chris Brown’s mea culpa. I doubt he has one in him. I mean the jackass has proven time and time again that he doesn’t think he did anything wrong, and he thinks it’s worthy of mockery. Oh, and let’s not forget how it’s our fault he doesn’t seem sorry. The only – only – thing that might ever make him have just a teeny, tiny sliver of doubt that maybe he wasn’t totally justified in beating the sh*t out of Rihanna are the consequences to his career. Which is why it’s so important that people continue to boycott Brown until he’s genuinely sorry. Or the end of time. Whichever comes first. Sadly, my money is on the end of time.

As much as the Post tried to make it sound like Brown will reveal some of the details of the event or actually tell the truth about what was going through his head, I don’t believe it. Once a temperamental asshole, always a temperamental asshole. It may take a long time, but I truly believe Chris Brown will eventually feel the repercussions. Even if it just means he ends up broke. At least he can sell that $300,000 “Oops!” necklace. That was a smart investment for the future.

By now you’ve probably heard about Michaele and Tareq Salahi. The now infamous couple crashed the White House State Dinner last week, embarrassing the White House and the Secret Service. How’d everyone find out about it? Michaele, who claims to be a former supermodel (along with a former Washington Redskins cheerleader – though the Redskins and several of the companies she says she’s modeled for all say Michaele has never worked for them) posted pictures all over her Facebook page. Though I should note that her page isn’t a traditional Facebook profile like most of us – with regular egos – have. It’s a fan page. That she put up at least five months ago (the oldest picture date I can find was uploaded in July), well before anyone had ever heard of her. Narcissism doesn’t even begin to describe what this chick has going on.

Supposedly Michaele wants onto the “Real Housewives of DC” – and even brought along a film crew. She’s definitely ravenous for whatever fame she can get – she and Tareq are shopping around their tell-all interview like no one’s business.

The White House gate-crashing couple is looking to cash-in on their exploits by selling the first exclusive interview for a six-figure sum. Tareq and Michaele Salahi - who got up close and personal with President Barack Obama – have pulled out of a planned interview with CNN because they want to land a big pay check for their tell-all.

Representatives for the couple have approached network chiefs asking for hundreds of thousands of dollars for the low-down on how the pair foiled the Secret Service and breached White House security. Major networks have been encouraged to get their bids in to secure the interview about the incident that sent shockwaves though Washington D.C.

Although their names were not on the official list managed by the Secret Service, the Salahis apparently had no trouble gaining entrance to the dinner honoring Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. Michaele Salahai has been trying to land a spot on Bravo’s The Real Housewifes [sic] of D.C. with many people claiming the whole incident was just a huge publicity stunt by the couple.

RadarOnline.com revealed that the aspiring socialites are no strangers to controversy as they have been named, either as defendants or plaintiffs on 16 different lawsuits. One of their businesses is in bankruptcy. Tareq has even sued his own mother. Through competing lawsuits, the couple won control of Oasis Winery from Tareq’s mother in 2007 but quickly ran the Virginia establishment into financial ruin.

Oasis filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in February, listing the IRS and American Express among the unpaid creditors. It also owed $224,000 for “rental of FedEx Redskins Suite and related hospitality services.” Among assets they’d acquired with Oasis money — but had already been subject to repo — were a $150,000 Aston Martin and a $90,000 boat. It remains to be seen if charges are brought against the pair who have reportedly been questioned by the Secret Service following the incident that was reported worldwide.

[From Radar]

Their scandalous, duplicitous, thieving history is epic. I truly am without words, I just don’t know what to say about them. Looking over Michaele’s Facebook fan page makes me physically ill. She has this link to clips from their 2003 wedding on YouTube. When you click to go directly to YouTube, you see the spot where people can write a little summary of their video. Michaele’s (improperly spelled) short summary is 566 words long! She goes into the monotonous details of the embarrassingly over-the-top wedding, noting:

A Wedding filled with love & passion with an exciting 1,836 Guests at the Historic St. Matthews Cathedral in Washington DC followed by the spectacular reception/wedding celebration at Oasis Winery in Hume, Virginia. This Wedding featured 28 Bridesmaids, 28 Groomsmen, 8 Flower Girls, 2 boy ring bearers. Highlights included best friend and Twenty Time Grammy Award-Winner Claude McKnight performing in Cathedral & at Oasis, a live 16 piece Choir, Herald Trumpets, A Live Orchestra during pre-reception, a 36 piece Big-Band during dinner & dancing, the barrel room & tasting room turned into late night dancing, concluding with a 30 minute MegaFireworks Show! Wedding was filled with the whos who of best friends from Washington DC, Virginia and guests from the entire globe that attended this wedding that celebrated Love & Passion! Featured wedding speakers were United States Supreme Court Justice Kennedy, Governor Mark Warner, Her Excellency Ambassador Margaret Heckler of Ireland, Family Member/Uncle Eddie OMalley, former HR Director for the CIA.

[From YouTube]

I’m sorry, I just realized you probably threw up in your mouth. My bad. That’s only the first teeny little paragraph. I have never wanted to slap a bitch so badly in my life. This is one of those people that doesn’t understand “your [fill in blank] is the center of your world, not THE world.” A lot of people seem to like her for the moxy it took to pull one over on the Secret Service. I challenge any of those people to read about all the lawsuits, all the businesses she’s put out of business, all the millions of bad debt, all the forgeries and lies, and tell me there is anything to admire about this parasite.

The photos below are from Michelle Salahi’s Facebook page.

On Friday, David Hasselhoff was hospitalized for seizures. While the Hoff’s people want us to believe that was the only reason, according to Radar, David was hospitalized yet again as a result of his alcoholism, after going on a several-day bender. Many news outlets are reporting that the Hoff was actually held under California’s involuntary psych hold. He was released today, but this is just the beginning – or continuation – of his problems.

David Hasselhoff has denied reports he was placed under involuntary psychiatric hold after he was hospitalised over the weekend. The Baywatch star spent two days at a Los Angeles hospital after reportedly suffering ‘a seizure’ at his Encino, California home on Friday morning. His lawyer Mel Goldsman said: ‘David is home now and he’s fine. I’m not sure where that information is coming from.’

The 57-year-old actor’s daughter Hayley called emergency services after he fell ill at the home. While his representative declined to give a reason behind Hasselhoff’s hospitalisation, he did deny the actor had been placed under psychiatric hold. RadarOnline.com alleged Hasselhoff had been held in hospital under the California Welfare and Institutions Code 5150, which allows authorities to take into custody those they believe may be a danger to themselves or others, are gravely disabled or suffer from a mental disorder.

A neighbour, named only as Christian, is quoted as claiming on the US website: ‘I asked one of the paramedics how David was doing and he told me his eyes were rolling back into his head, he was drooling and that he’d had a seizure. ‘This isn’t the first time this has happened to him.

The 57-year-old has a long history of alcoholism. He had allegedly been drinking in the last week and saw one of his personal doctors on Wednesday after returning from a trip to Canada. Last month, Hasselhoff was admitted to rehab amid reports he accidentally hit a doctor during an alcohol binge. He has also been hospitalised on two other occasions this year, reportedly suffering from alcohol poisoning.

[From the Daily Mail]

Radar followed the story all weekend and reported on Friday that Hasselhoff had been on a several day bender, both before and after he saw his doctor. They also claim that family members want him to enter a locked-down rehab facility, since his problem is obviously very extreme.

As if that weren’t enough for his teenage daughters, their mother, Hasselhoff’s ex-wife Pamela Bach, was arrested for DUI over the weekend! She claims she was consoling her daughters over dinner, and throughout the course of the evening had several glasses of wine.

According to TMZ, Bach was pulled over after she spent an emotional night trying to console her daughters, who were apparently shaken up by Hasselhoff’s hospitalization. During their dinner, TMZ claims she had “a few drinks,” and was later pulled over and registered blood-alcohol levels of .14 and .13 on subsequent tests. The legal limit for driving in California is .08.

This is Bach’s second DUI arrest, and should she be charged, she faces mandatory jail time under California law. She pled no contest to a prior DUI in March of 2009.

Bach released a statement saying that she is “remorseful and mortified,” about the incident, and that she and the family are “going through a really difficult time between David being in the hospital and dealing with the divorce.”

[From Popeater]

Their poor daughters. Whenever I’ve seen Hayley, 17, and Taylor, 19, interviewed, they seem genuinely nice and sweet, and they appear to have a close relationship with their dad. I’ve never seen them with their mom, so I can’t comment on that. Pamela told TMZ she was on her way to an AA meeting last night, though I doubt that makes everything better. Talk about just piling crap on top of more crap. I really hope the Hoff gets help, but his alcoholism is soooo extreme that it’s hard to really think he will. But he’s the kind of guy you genuinely root for. He doesn’t seem like he’s got a bad bone in him, but is definitely at the mercy of his addiction.

Here’s David Hasselhoff at the 2009 MTV European Music Awards in Berlin on November 11th. Pamela is shown at the Chochi Fiamengo Designer Fashion Show in Hollywood on November 21st. Images thanks to WENN.com .

Nick Hogan is at it again. Okay, probably not. Nick got in another car crash on Saturday night. Now this was nothing like the epic car crash that nearly killed his best friend John Graziano, and certainly deprived John of a normal life for the rest of his days. This accident was so minor that when police arrived at the scene, they didn’t even file a report. Still, this is Nick Hogan so it’s hard not to assume anything but the absolute worst.

The 19 year old, who appeared alongside his wrestling champ dad on reality TV series Hogan Knows Best, was uninjured after the collision in Los Angeles on Saturday.

Police were called to the scene but didn’t write up an official report, according to TMZ.com.

Ironically, the teen was driving home from a fundraising event for Keep It On The Track, a charity that encourages safe driving.

It’s not Hogan’s first road mishap - in 2007, he wrecked his sports car in a devastating crash that left his passenger, John Graziano, seriously injured. He’s also notched up several tickets for speeding.

[From Yahoo UK via Gossip Rocks]

I checked out every report I could, and there’s no mention of speeding. To me, that’s Nick’s serious problem – I’d call it an addiction really. Speeding can obviously lead to serious car wrecks, but my feeling is that Nick’s got a serious issue with racing, versus trying to make his car do insane stunts or something of that nature. I want to get all up in arms about this, but it doesn’t seem like there’s any reason to as of yet. We don’t even know who was at fault or what kind of accident it was. The irony of Hogan coming back from a function for his vague and non-specific safe on the roads charity is hard to ignore though.

Nick Hogan is pictured taking in the scene at the Sundance Film Festival in January 2009. Credits: Fame.